Applying Ensemble Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor and Decision Tree for Predicting Oral Reading Rate Levels

Main Article Content

Jwan Abdulkhaliq Mohammed

Abstract

For many years, reading rate as word correct per minute (WCPM) has been investigated by many researchers as an indicator of learners’ level of oral reading speed, accuracy, and comprehension. The aim of the study is to predict the levels of WCPM using three machine learning algorithms which are Ensemble Classifier (EC), Decision Tree (DT), and K- Nearest Neighbor (KNN). The data of this study were collected from 100 Kurdish EFL students in the 2nd-year, English language department, at the University of Duhok in 2021. The outcomes showed that the ensemble classifier (EC) obtained the highest accuracy of testing results with a value of 94%. Also, EC recorded the highest precision, recall, and F1 scores with values of 0.92 for the three performance measures. The Receiver Operating Character curve (ROC curve) also got the highest results than other classification algorithms. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the ensemble classifier is the best and most accurate model for predicting reading rate (accuracy) WCPM.    

Article Details

How to Cite
Applying Ensemble Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor and Decision Tree for Predicting Oral Reading Rate Levels . (2023). Ibn AL-Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Sciences, 36(3), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.30526/36.3.3102
Section
Computer

How to Cite

Applying Ensemble Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor and Decision Tree for Predicting Oral Reading Rate Levels . (2023). Ibn AL-Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Sciences, 36(3), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.30526/36.3.3102

Publication Dates

References

Grabe, W. Fluency in reading—thirty-five years later. Reading in a Foreign Language 2010, 22, 1, 71-83.

Nation, P. Developing fluency. In Exploring EFL Fluency in Asia; Muller T., Adamson, J., P. Brown, S. Herder., Eds.; Springer: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 11-25.

Rasinski, T. V. Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL) 2004.

Morrison, T.G.; Wilcox, B. Assessing expressive oral reading fluency. Education Sciences 2020, 10, 59, 1- 13.

Williams, J. L.; Skinner, C. H.; Floyd, R. G.; Hale, A. D.; Neddenriep, C.; Kirk, E. Words correct per minute: The variance in standardized reading scores accounted for by reading speed. Psychology in the Schools 2011, 48, 87–101.

Mahendra, M. W.; Marantika, I. M. Y. The Phonological Interference in EFL Reading. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 2020, 5, 1, 27-34.

Rahmawati, A.; Rosmalina, I.; Anggraini, H.W. Prosodic reading and reading comprehension in university. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture 2020, 5, 1, 89- 108.

Sonuç, E. Thyroid Disease Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2021, 1963,1, 012140.

Sajja, G. S.; Mustafa, M.; Ponnusamy, R.; Abdufattokhov, S. Machine learning algorithms in intrusion detection and classification. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 2021, 25, 6, 12211-12219.

Ahmad, A.; Ostrowski, K. A.; Maślak, M.; Farooq, F.; Mehmood, I.; Nafees, A. Comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting the compressive strength of concrete at high temperature. Materials 2021, 14,15, 4222.

Bolaños, D.; Cole, R. A.; Ward, W. H.; Tindal, G. A.; Hasbrouck, J.; Schwanenflugel, P. J. Human and automated assessment of oral reading fluency. Journal of educational psychology 2013, 105, 4, 1142.

Kim, H.; Hannah, L.; Jang, E. E. Using acoustic features to predict oral reading fluency of students with diverse language backgrounds. In Collated Papers for the ALTE 7th International Conference, Madrid 2021,198.

Day, R. R. & Harsch, K. Cover to cover 2 reading comprehension and EFL reading. English Language, Literature, and Teaching fluency. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Adithiyaa, T.; Chandramohan, D.; Sathish, T. Optimal prediction of process parameters by GWO-KNN in stirring-squeeze casting of AA2219 reinforced metal matrix composites. Materials Today: Proceedings 2020, 21, 1000-1007.

Miranda-Vega, J. E.; Rivas-Lopez, M.; Fuentes, W. F. K-nearest neighbor classification for pattern recognition of a reference source light for machine vision system. IEEE Sensors Journal 2020, 21,10, 11514-11521.

Wibowo, A. H.; Oesman, T. I. The comparative analysis on the accuracy of k-NN, Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree Algorithms in predicting crimes and criminal actions in Sleman Regency. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2020, February,1450,1, 012076.

Charbuty, B.; Abdulazeez, A. Classification based on decision tree algorithm for machine learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends 2021, 2, 1, 20-28.

Lee, C. S.; Cheang, P. Y. S.; Moslehpour, M. Predictive analytics in business analytics: decision tree. Advances in Decision Sciences 2022, 26,1, 1-29.

Li, X.; Yi, S.; Cundy, A. B.; Chen, W. Sustainable decision-making for contaminated site risk management: A decision tree model using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 371, 133612.

Matloob, F.; Ghazal, T. M.; Taleb, N.; Aftab, S.; Ahmad, M.; Khan, M. A.; ...; Soomro, T. R. Software defect prediction using ensemble learning: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 98754 - 98771

Alamir, M. A. A novel acoustic scene classification model using the late fusion of convolutional neural networks and different ensemble classifiers. Applied Acoustics 2021, 175, 107829 and Culture, 5, 1, 89-108

Mishra, P. K.; Yadav, A.; Pazoki, M. A. novel fault classification scheme for series capacitor compensated transmission line based on bagged tree ensemble classifier. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 27373-27382.