On ƞǤ_Ş-Compactness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30526/38.1.3322Keywords:
Nano Grill semi-open compact space, ƞǤ_Ş Ỏ-semi-open compact, nano compactAbstract
Open sets may be viewed as an extension of semi-open sets by applying the notions of semi-open sets and grill nano to nGs-open sets, with the following four goals in mind: The objective is to characterize nGs-open sets by examining and proving numerous of its attributes and comments. And investigate and define new kinds of functions based on the concept of nGs-open sets, using sets of nGs-open sets, we will define a new type of Compact type and call it nGs-open compact then we will find the relationship between these new types of Compact type with nano compact. We will also talk about the relationship between nano grill semi-open sets and continuous functions and the relationship between nano grill semi-open sets and irresolute function as well we give some examples, proofs and observations about the relationship between nano grill semi-open sets and functions and their relation to nano compact.
References
1. Choquet G. Sur les notions de filtre et de grille. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci Paris. 1947;224:171-3.
2. Al-Omari A, Noiri T. Decomposition of continuity via grilles. Jordan J Math Stat. 2011;4(1):33-46.
3. Mustafa MO, Esmaeel RB. Some properties in grill–topological open and closed sets. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1879/1/012038.
4. Choquet G. Sur les notions de filtre et de grille. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci Paris. 1947;224:171-3.
5. Crossley SG. Semi-closure. Texas J Sci. 1971;22:99-112.
6. Levine N. Generalized closed sets in topology. Rend Circ Mat Palermo. 1970;19:89-96.
7. Thivagar ML, Richard C. On nano forms of weakly open sets. Int J Math Stat Invent. 2013;1(1):31-7.
8. Thron WJ. Proximity structures and grills. Math Ann. 1973;206:35-62.
9. Mahmood AJ, Naser AI. Connectedness via generalizations of semi-open sets. Ibn AL-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci. 2022;35(4):235-40.
10. Suliman SS, Esmaeel RB. Some properties of connectedness in grill topological spaces. Ibn AL-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci. 2022;35(4):213-9.
11. Roy B, Mukherjee MN. On a typical topology induced by a grill. Soochow J Math. 2007;33(4):771.
12. Mandal D, Mukherjee MN. On a class of sets via grill: A decomposition of continuity. An Stiint Univ Ovidius Constanta Ser Mat. 2012;20(1):307-16.
13. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci. 1982;11:341-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956
14. Esmaeel RB, Saeed SG. Nano αg Ị-open set. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1879/1/012031
15. Hatir E, Jafari S. On some new classes of sets and a new decomposition of continuity via grills. J Adv Math Stud. 2010;3(1):33-41.
16. Njåstad O. On some classes of nearly open sets. Pac J Math. 1965;15(3):961-70.
17 . Noori S, Yousif YY. Soft simply compact spaces. Iraqi J Sci. 2020;108-13.
18 . Krishnaprakash S, Ramesh R, Suresh R. Nano-compactness and nano-connectedness in nano topological spaces. Int J Pure Appl Math. 2018;119(13):107-15.
19 . Noori S, Yousif YY. Soft simply compact spaces. Iraqi J Sci. 2020;108-13.
20 . Ryll-Nardzewski C. A remark on the Cartesian product of two compact spaces. Bull Acad Polon Sci Cl III. 1954;2:265-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ibn AL-Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
licenseTerms